Vai al contenuto
Confronti

DORA vs GDPR

How the financial sector's digital resilience framework meets EU data protection obligations

Confronto rapido

Panoramica affiancata delle principali dimensioni normative

DimensioneDORAGDPR
Primary objectiveMake sure financial entities can withstand, respond to and recover from ICT disruptions and cyber threatsProtect the fundamental right to personal data protection and ensure the free movement of personal data in the EU
ScopeFinancial entities (banks, insurers, investment firms, payment institutions, crypto-asset service providers) and their ICT third-party service providers, with direct oversight of the critical onesAny organisation, anywhere, that processes personal data of individuals in the EU, in every sector
Data handlingCovers the security and resilience of ICT systems processing all types of data, personal and non-personal, with a focus on availability, integrity and continuityGoverns the processing of personal data: lawful bases and the principles of minimisation, purpose limitation, accuracy and storage limitation
Incident reportingMajor ICT incidents go to financial supervisors: initial notification within 4 hours of classification, intermediate report within 72 hours, final report within 1 monthPersonal data breaches go to the supervisory authority within 72 hours of becoming aware; affected individuals must be told without undue delay if the breach poses a high risk
Third-party managementFull ICT third-party risk framework: a mandatory register of providers, specific contractual clauses, concentration risk management and EU-level oversight of critical ICT providersController-processor framework: data processing agreements under Article 28, sub-processor controls, international transfer rules and joint controllership arrangements
GovernanceThe management body must approve the ICT risk strategy, allocate budget, take regular ICT training and remain accountable for DORA complianceA Data Protection Officer (DPO) is mandatory for certain organisations; the controller must demonstrate compliance through records, DPIAs and data protection by design and by default
PenaltiesSet by Member States; for critical ICT third-party providers, a periodic penalty of up to 1% of average daily worldwide turnover per day of non-compliance (max 6 months)Up to EUR 20 million or 4% of global annual turnover for the most serious infringements; up to EUR 10 million or 2% for less severe ones

Differenze principali

Che cosa distingue queste normative

  • DORA

    DORA is sector-specific; the GDPR is universal

    DORA applies only to financial entities and their ICT providers, with requirements tailored to the financial system. The GDPR applies to any organisation processing personal data, whatever its industry. A bank must comply with both; a retailer processing customer data needs only the GDPR.

  • GDPR

    The GDPR protects personal data; DORA protects ICT systems

    The GDPR focuses on the rights of the people whose data is processed: consent, access, erasure, portability. DORA focuses on the resilience of the technology itself: uptime, recovery, resistance to threats. A DORA incident may involve no personal data at all, and a GDPR breach may involve no ICT disruption.

  • DORA

    DORA requires operational resilience testing

    DORA mandates specific testing programmes, including threat-led penetration testing (TLPT) every three years for significant entities. The GDPR requires appropriate security measures but does not prescribe testing methods or frequencies.

  • GDPR

    The GDPR grants extensive individual rights

    The GDPR gives data subjects enforceable rights to access, rectify, erase and port their data, plus the right to object to processing. DORA creates no equivalent individual rights; it focuses on the resilience of the system rather than on individuals.

  • DORA

    DORA creates EU-level oversight of ICT providers

    DORA introduces the Lead Overseer mechanism for critical ICT third-party providers, allowing direct supervision at EU level. The GDPR relies on national data protection authorities, which cooperate across borders through the one-stop-shop mechanism and the European Data Protection Board.

Dove si sovrappongono

Ambiti in cui le due normative hanno punti in comune

  1. Both require incident reporting to authorities within set deadlines: DORA for ICT incidents to financial supervisors, the GDPR for data breaches to data protection authorities
  2. Both set contractual requirements for third parties: DORA for ICT service providers, the GDPR for data processors
  3. Both require appropriate technical and organisational security measures to protect the data and systems an organisation manages
  4. Both require senior management to take responsibility for compliance and allocate enough resources to it

Quale si applica al Suo caso?

Scenari comuni e quale normativa prevale

You are a bank operating in the EU that processes customer personal data

Both DORA and the GDPR apply in full. DORA governs your ICT risk management, resilience testing and oversight of ICT third parties. The GDPR governs how you process customer data, breach notifications and data subject rights. An ICT incident that also involves personal data triggers duties under both at once.

DORAGDPR

You are a cloud provider serving EU financial institutions

DORA applies to you as an ICT third-party service provider, and possibly as a critical one under the Lead Overseer. The GDPR applies to you as a processor handling personal data for your financial clients. You must meet both DORA's contractual and resilience requirements and the GDPR's data processing agreement obligations.

DORAGDPR

You are an e-commerce company outside financial services

DORA does not apply to you. Focus on the GDPR for your customer data: privacy notices, consent management, data subject rights and breach notification procedures.

GDPR

Domande frequenti

Domande comuni su queste normative

Both apply at once. Under DORA, the entity must report the major ICT incident to its financial supervisor (initial notification within 4 hours of classification). Under the GDPR, if personal data is compromised, it must notify the data protection authority within 72 hours, and the affected individuals without undue delay if the breach poses a high risk to their rights. These are parallel duties to different authorities.

No. The security measures overlap, but DORA and the GDPR have different objectives and requirements. DORA makes your ICT systems resilient but does not cover data subject rights, lawful bases for processing, data minimisation or the safeguards for international transfers that the GDPR requires. Each needs its own work.

They complement each other but are distinct. DORA requires financial entities to keep a register of ICT third-party providers, with contractual clauses on security, resilience testing, exit strategies and audit rights. The GDPR requires data processing agreements under Article 28 covering the scope of processing, security, sub-processing and help with data subject rights. ICT providers that also process personal data must meet both sets of requirements.

The GDPR has clearer and generally higher fixed ceilings, up to EUR 20 million or 4% of global annual turnover. DORA leaves most amounts to Member States, apart from the periodic penalties on critical ICT third-party providers (up to 1% of average daily worldwide turnover). In practice, total exposure depends on the nature and scale of the breach under each framework.

With Radar, Reversa's agents read the official sources for both frameworks, from ESA guidance to data protection authority decisions, and tell you which changes affect you, and why. Compliance carries the obligations of both texts to controls, owners, deadlines and evidence, so shared work such as security measures, incident notification and third-party contracts is done once. Research answers questions across both laws, each answer traced to the article and version it relies on.

Legga le guide complete

Altri confronti

Bring DORA and GDPR compliance together with Reversa

Financial entities answer to both digital resilience and data protection rules. Reversa carries both sets of obligations to the same controls and the same team.

  1. 01Riunione iniziale
  2. 02Dimostrazione sul Suo caso
  3. 03Implementazione in poche settimane
DORA vs GDPR | Reversa